Photo by Dev Asangbam on Unsplash

Creating the ‘other’

Othering occurs when it becomes generally accepted that a group, nation or ethnicity is in some way inferior to ours. It is used to justify actions which would normally be regarded as unacceptable. They become acceptable because they’re applied to ‘the other’, the enemy within or beyond our borders. Othering involves propaganda and widespread support from the media, leading to acceptance from significant sections of the population. It divides people into an ‘in-group’ and ‘out group’. The views and concerns of the ‘out-group’ are discounted or ignored. By marking them as fundamentally different from the accepted and welcomed norm, they can be regarded as inferior, as less than human.

Relatively civilised

When Hitler decided to emulate Napoleon, he invaded the Soviet Union. He sent a group of Nazis to follow the German Army and exterminate everyone who was still alive. This was acceptable to Hitler, to his Nazi followers, and to parts of the German population because ‘othering’ had allowed Slavs, Jews and Roma to be seen as racially inferior.

If you ask anyone in the United States how many died in the Vietnam War, the answer will probably be 58,000 – but this is only the number of US soldiers who died. To most US citizens, the three million Asians who died as a result of the conflict simply don’t register. They were very successfully othered.

CBS journalist, Charlie D’Agata, recently apologised for a broadcast he made from Ukraine. He suggested that the Ukraine “isn’t a place, with all due respect, like Iraq or Afghanistan, that has seen conflict raging for decades. This is a relatively civilized, relatively European – I have to choose those words carefully, too – city, one where you wouldn’t expect that, or hope that it’s going to happen”. In other words, it’s much more acceptable if it happens to those ‘others’, who are not quite like us.

Daniel Hannon writes of the Ukrainians in The Daily Telegraph, “They seem so like us. That is what makes it so shocking. Ukraine is a European country. Its people watch Netflix and have Instagram accounts, vote in free elections and read uncensored newspapers. War is no longer something visited upon impoverished and remote populations.” Meanwhile, Ukrainian residents from Africa are being refused entry to Poland because they are black. When ITV anchor, Charlene White pointed this out she was criticised for ‘playing the race card’. Similarly, Austria took a hard line against Afghan refugees, but now its Chancellor says, “It’s different in Ukraine than in countries like Afghanistan, we’re talking about neighbourhood help.”

In response we have to ask,

  • Why is a Palestinian life viewed as less valuable than an Israeli?
  • Why are there no sanctions against Saudi Arabia?
  • Why does the West not support Afghans who are starving to death?

As Tanweer Dar writes in his wonderful article ‘Why some refugees appear to be more welcome than others’, bigotry surely has no place in humanitarian aid.

Avoidance of war

The process of othering is usually led by weak politicians in need of scapegoats or distractions from their own shortcomings. It’s often supported by lazy journalists who put their careers ahead of fair and balanced reporting. It is also easier to ‘other’ a group when there is no counter view available, for example, the Uyghurs in China, and the Rohingya in Burma. Many Russians believe the messaging of their state-controlled press that Ukraine is full of Nazi terrorists intent on attacking Russians. The Russian government is othering Ukrainians…. but no doubt the reverse is also true.

The point here is that the predominant view of many wars is racist and must be challenged. If we reject othering and encourage the view that all lives are equally valuable and significant (as I argue here), it may be possible to avoid such tragic conflicts in the future.

We promise that if you subscribe we will never take money from your bank account, won’t send you endless emails trying to get you to buy something you never wanted in the first place and we will never share your details with any third party.

What we will do is send you regular newsletters to keep you up to date with what we are doing and give you handy links to the content we create. You can choose how often we contact you and can unsubscribe at any time.

AND IT’S ALL FREE!!

2 thought on “Othering: The Racism of War”
  1. 1. The west is trying to get aid to Afghanistan, but it’s currently overrun by terrorists and they have to be careful not to start another war by going in there. They will not be welcomed, and it will only end in violence. The Taliban are forcefully REJECTING western aid. This is a Taliban/Extremism issue, and not a problem driven by the west. As for Biden pulling out – people bitched at America for YEARS to get out of there, and the moment they did (albeit with poor timing), people were like “hey, where you going?!” Hypocritical virtue signalling that I’ve little time for.

    2. Saudi Arabia are not threatening to drop nukes, are not on the verge of blowing up Europe’s biggest nuclear station, and are not potentially days or weeks away from launching an actual World War. Ukraine is not sadder or more tragic, it’s just more dangerous right now and needs attention in the more immediate future. It cannot be allowed to escalate, because it will not stop with the invasion of Ukraine. If you don’t understand this, you need to learn. This is not a racism issue.

    3. Nobody except radical Pro-Israeli people are saying Palestine’s lives are less important. They aren’t. All lives are valid when innocent people are involved in war. The Israel/Palestine war is also ancient; it’s not something that just slammed into people’s faces a week ago. The shock-and-awe is gone, and if you know a lick about sociology or psychology, this is just how it works. Should the Ukraine war wage on for 10, 50 or 500 years, people will stop talking about it completely eventually, because it’ll be a “norm” for them. Right now it isn’t.

    4. If you’re reading the news and it’s money over truth, you’re reading the wrong news. Do better.

    5. ALL countries only talk about the casualties that matter to them. This is not a race issue, and it is not a western issue. For instance, the news right now, all over pro-Ukrainian Europe is reporting civilian deaths of Ukrainians, but military deaths of Russians. Nobody is talking about military Ukranian deaths or civilian Russian deaths (either those living in Ukraine, or protestors in Russia proper)

    1. 1. The West are bankrupting Afghanistan by closing down its bank accounts and applying a wide range of sanctions. It’s immoral and inhumane. As for hypocrisy, it’s two very different things to say, ‘Provide aid’ and ‘Invade’.
      2. Saudi Arabia aren’t ‘threatening’ anything. They’re ACTUALLY perpetrating far worse war crimes and killing far greater numbers of non-combatants than in Ukraine. This is where the hypocrisy lies: in melting all over Ukraine will ignoring greater and more prolonged war crimes elsewhere.
      3. Watch this video https://twitter.com/i/status/1511452537790029833
      4. All corporate news is money (or establishment power) over news. Open your eyes. Also read this: https://dorseteye.com/i-bought-a-newspaper-and-then-i-bought-another/
      5. I think you’re so desperate to see this as a ‘just war’, not a war brought about by malign actors on all sides, that you’re happy to turn a blind eye to racism. But do you know what people are who turn a blind eye to racism?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.